The expansive literature on law and justice across Africa emphasizes why people do not use lower state courts. Consequently, a striking lack of attention is paid to how and why people do engage with lower state courts. Drawing on a systematic literature review and a multi-sited qualitative study, we make three contributions on this topic. First, we explore how this academic gap emerged. Second, we critique the procedural justice model that currently underlies much ‘access to justice’ programming, which seeks to improve citizens’ engagements with the courts. In place of what we describe as its arithmetic assumptions about institutional engagement, value, and legitimacy, we propose a trifactor framework. Citizen engagement, we argue, occurs as people reconcile how they think the courts should act, how they expect them to act, and how they need them to act in any given instance. Third, drawing on our empirical studies, we highlight that this framework is flexible enough to capture people’s actually existing decision-making in a wide variety of settings and to map how those trade-offs shift throughout the process of their case, providing important insights into ideas of justice and statehood.
Resource
A summons to the magistrates’ courts in South Africa and Uganda
Topics
Public AuthorityRegions
East and Southern AfricaCountries
UgandaRegional Hub
Central and East Africa HubRegional Hub Themes
Conflict and peacebuildingDOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adaa026
Related content
Briefing
SSHAP West Africa Hub: Addressing the kush epidemic in Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone has seen a sharp rise in the use of ‘kush’ – a relatively new drug formed through mixing several constituent drugs, including opioids, which is proving highly addictive and is having serious negative health and social consequences. In…
West Africa Hub
SSHAP
2024
Briefing
Key considerations: Female genital mutilation among Sudanese displaced populations in Egypt
Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a deeply entrenched cultural practice involving the partial or total removal of the external female genitalia for non-medical reasons. It is recognised as a severe violation of human rights. Worldwide, four million girls are subjected…
SSHAP
2024
Briefing
Fellow’s brief: Addressing the humanitarian needs of forced rural-to-city migrants in north-west Nigeria with a focus on mental health vulnerability
This brief explores the humanitarian needs of forced rural area-to-city migrants in the north-west of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, with an emphasis on their vulnerability to mental health challenges. The brief presents key considerations in addressing the humanitarian needs…
West Africa Hub
SSHAP
2024
Briefing
Key considerations: Mutual aid lessons and experiences from Emergency Response Rooms in Sudan
The civil war in the Republic of Sudan, which began in April 2023, has fuelled and exacerbated an already severe humanitarian crisis. As of September 2024, over 25 million people – half the country’s population – need assistance. In response,…
Central and East Africa Hub
SSHAP
2024